An Exploration of Authorial Stance in SSCI-ranked Journals versus Non-SSCI-ranked Journals
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Authorial Studies using Ranked Lexical Features
The purpose of this article is to propose a tool for measuring distances between different styles of one or more authors. The main study is focused on measuring and visualizing distances in a space induced by ranked lexical features. We investigate the case of Vladimir Nabokov, a bilingual Russian English language author.
متن کاملSelf-archiving and the Copyright Transfer Agreements of ISI-ranked library and information science journals
A study of ISI ranked Library and Information Science (LIS) journals (n=52) is reported. The study examined the stances of publishers as expressed in the Copyright Transfer Agreements (CTAs) of the journals towards self-archiving, the practice of depositing digital copies of one's works, preferably in an OAI-compliant open access repository. Results show that 62 % (32) do not make their CTAs av...
متن کاملQuality of reporting of phase II trials: a focus on highly ranked oncology journals.
BACKGROUND Phase II trials represent an essential step in the development of anticancer drugs. This study assesses the quality of their reporting in highly ranked oncology journals, investigates predictive factors of quality, and proposes reporting guidelines. PATIENTS AND METHODS We reviewed the table of contents of all volumes of eight peer-reviewed oncology journals published in English be...
متن کاملEthics and CSR Research in Top Ranked IS Journals, 1980-2013: A Developing Trend or Anomaly?
This study analyzes scholarly research on ethics and CSR (Corporate Social Responsibility) in selected top ranked journals in the Information Systems field from 1980-2013. The purpose is to identify and examine the salience of ethics and CSR concepts and approaches in IS journals. Eighty-six articles were analyzed using bibliometric methods. Results show an increase in the use of ethics and CSR...
متن کاملNon-Prioritized Ranked Belief Change
Traditional accounts of belief change have been criticised for placing undue emphasis on the new belief provided as input. A recent proposal to address such issues is the framework of Ghose and Goebel for non-prioritised belief change based on default theories [8]. A novel feature of this approach is the introduction of disbeliefs alongside beliefs which allows for a view of belief contraction ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: 3L The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies
سال: 2019
ISSN: 0128-5157,2550-2247
DOI: 10.17576/3l-2019-2503-05